Home >

news ヘルプ

論文・著書情報


タイトル
和文: 
英文:Comparison of Removed Fuel Compositions of CANDLE, PWR and FBR 
著者
和文: 永田 章人, 関本 博.  
英文: Akito Nagata, Hiroshi Sekimoto.  
言語 English 
掲載誌/書名
和文: 
英文:Proceedings of the 8th International Conference GLOBAL 2007 Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Systems 
巻, 号, ページ        
出版年月 2007年9月 
出版者
和文: 
英文: 
会議名称
和文: 
英文:The 8th International Conference GLOBAL 2007 Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Systems 
開催地
和文: 
英文:Idaho, USA 
アブストラクト A new reactor burnup strategy CANDLE was proposed, where shapes of neutron flux, nuclide densities and power density distributions remain constant but move to an axial direction. Application of this burnup strategy to neutron rich fast reactors makes excellent performances. Only natural or depleted uranium is required for the replaced fresh fuels. About 40% of natural or depleted uranium undergoes fission.In this paper, spent fuels of PWR, FBR and CANDLE reactor are compared. Fresh fuels of PWR, FBR and CANDLE reactor are 4.1% enriched uranium (UO2), MOX with 18.5% plutonium enrichment and natural uranium nitride (natural-UN), respectively.In once-through fuel cycle point of view, low disposal amount for high energy is better and CANDLE reactor can decrease this amount more than other reactors, especially it is only one-tenth of PWR fuel. Also, it can decrease MA and this amount is 0.4 times of PWR. Total FP amount of each reactor is nearly same. However, LLFP amount of CANDLE reactor is the largest.

©2007 Institute of Science Tokyo All rights reserved.